A National Review post called “Dear Hysterical Liberals: Hectoring Hurts Science” says this: “But conservatives (including Christian conservatives) aren’t anti-science as much as they’re anti-hectoring and unpersuaded by naked appeals to authority delivered with maximum condescension.” No joke. Early in college, my religious and political beliefs developed largely for the same reasons: because I saw solid, irrefutable results in one way of thought and not in the opposite way, and because the advocates of those opposite views typically relied more on belittling the character of others than on engaging in serious argument. I noticed that anti-Mormons (and anti-Christians in general) as well as secular leftists tended to ridicule others rather than refute their points, or even support their own. I saw so much bandwagon elitism from those allied corners that it just added a deep layer of comfortable relief to the more objective conclusions I had otherwise reached about politics and religion.
If aliens from another planet came and observed America, they would determine that the purpose of our public school system is to make girls and minorities feel good about themselves. After all, where does the balance of our energy and resources go? What are our most sacred values there? What agendas permeate the system top to bottom more than any other? Based on the evidence, what else could those extraterrestrial visitors possibly conclude? Continue reading →