The Clark County School District has a little discussed program called Minority-to-Majority which, according to one of the few references to it in school district documents, is “a transfer request for a student to attend a school where the student will bring both the sending and receiving schools’ minority average closer to the district-wide minority average (m-to-m transfer).”
Even the name of this program, let alone the primary definition of it, is profoundly racist.
This would seem to be a stark violation of the landmark 2007 Supreme Court decision where any kind of racially based busing, even for the purpose of integration, was struck down as unconstitutional. In the memorable words of Chief Justice John Roberts, “The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.”
The program was started in 1999, long before the Supreme Curt decision, but how is it still in practice? Has nobody challenged it? Is it secretive enough that not enough people are aware of it?
Defenders might assert that Minority-to-Majority has good intentions–that integration fosters diversity and gives transfer students more opportunities, etc., etc. However, my practical experience shows that this does not work.
I live in the zone for one of the “minority” schools in this program, and I work at the “majority” school where many of those students go. In fact, most of the teenagers in my neighborhood seem to go to the school where I work. These transfer students, by and large, hardly seem to benefit from the environmental change, producing disproportionate failure rates and disciplinary infractions, as far as I can objectively tell.
Whether or not the program is successful, though, the fact remains that it is undeniably illegal and racist. Such bald facts should give even the most sympathetic social engineer pause.