The NCAA has a rule that remedial high school courses don’t count towards eligibility for college athletics. I don’t know how other parts of the country have dealt with this, but CCSD’s answer has partly been to reduce / eliminate remedial classes.
That’s great, right? All those future college hoops stars are being put into more rigorous classes, just like the NCAA wanted, right?
No, of course not. Their rule didn’t suddenly make everyone smarter. What schools do is simply change the names of classes, removing the “remedial” stigma from the title, while keeping them stocked with the same kids who would have been in remedial classes anyway (thus cheating the rule by “technically” complying with it), or–even worse–those poor kids who need more help get lumped into the regular classes where they push up class sizes, fall behind, cause trouble, irritate and bore the students who are at that level, and still certainly don’t get the experience that the NCAA’s rosy-eyed rule must assume they magically will.
This isn’t to say that all athletes are slow–actually, my experience is quite the opposite–but those who do need slower classes are poorly served by this rule, and the rest of their campus suffers for it, too. Schools can’t just target the schedules of potential future athletes, so everyone–sports players and not–are equally affected by the policy. The NCAA could do everyone a huge favor by revising this ineffective, counterproductive rule.