A new report this week documents the damage done to children who grow up in homes where parents live with partners without formal commitment:
In the latter half of the 20th century, “divorce posed the biggest threat to marriage in the United States,” sociology professor W. Bradford Wilcox and 17 other scholars said in a report released this week by the Institute for American Values’ Center for Marriage and Families and the National Marriage Project at the University of Virginia.
That is no longer the case, they said.
“Today, the rise of cohabiting households with children is the largest unrecognized threat to the quality and stability of children’s family lives.”
I’ve been beating this drum for a while. What’s great in this article are the quotes from a woman who still wants to champion “alternative” families:
“Generalities about cohabiting are not particularly helpful,” said Ms. Schranz, a Unitarian Universalist minister in California.
“What matters is the quality of the relationships of the people cohabiting,” she said. “Just as there are poor relationships among cohabiting people, there are poor relationships among married people. The status of their relationship does not govern the quality of the relationship.”
“Generalities?” You mean facts gathered from research? Isn’t it funny when people want to rebut facts and research merely by repeating the wishful thinking of their fantasy world views? Good grief, that’s the kind of narcissistic solipsism that got our society into this mess.
(more…)
Like this:
Like Loading...
Read Full Post »